If this is useful to you, a coffee helps keep it going. Anonymous is fine too: leave the name blank and stay signed out.
Board meetings, votes and the district's finances, collected from public filings and kept in one place. Two ways in: browse the record, or ask about it.
Browse and search the whole record in one place: agendas and votes, meeting video with transcripts, warrants, purchase orders, vendor accounts and the district's financials.
Put a question to an analyst that has read the record: what was decided, what was promised, what doesn't add up. Every answer cites the document it came from. Now Plexus 1.0: it also reads the record against what a California school district is expected to do. Record updated through October 6, 2026.
English and math for the district and every school: eleven years of trends, what drove each change, how it does against similar districts, and what became of its graduates.
See Newark → Alameda CountyCompare and rank every district and school in the county by subject, grade and student group, with California as the reference.
Open the county results → CaliforniaEvery school in the state on one map, colored by English, math or both, from green for high to red for low.
Open the map →Scores track who attends a school, so this index asks how a school does against schools serving similar students: a model fitted on every traditional California school — parents' education, economic status, English learners, disabilities, grades tested; no race or ethnicity — gives an expected result, a percentile, and the twelve most similar schools by name.
Graduation rate, the share meeting UC/CSU “A–G” requirements, college/career readiness, and the share in a college within a year, for every high school and district. One finding: who attends a school explains most of its test scores but only a fifth of whether its students complete A–G.
The same class followed up the grades — grade 3 one year, grade 4 the next — against the county's and the state's same class, separating “the school improved” from “this year's children differed”.
Pick a profile — parents' education, economic status, English learner, disability — and a county or district, and see how such students scored at each school beside its overall rate.
Each change split between student groups — last year, three years, since before the pandemic — with a short written analysis of what mattered most; the figures are the evidence, and the text never guesses at why.
The Bay Area or all 58 counties compared; a diversity index with each school's “mix gap” from its district; achievement levels by grade; every reported student group. All from the California Department of Education's public files.
Until now the analyst could only find and quote what the district's own record says. Plexus 1.0 adds a second source of knowledge: a researched model of how a California school district is expected to work — what the law requires of it, what is typical, what good practice looks like, and the warning signs of trouble, each with its deadline and the statute or guidance it comes from. That model is built separately, from public sources, and says nothing about Newark in particular.
Between the record and the model, Plexus keeps a standing understanding of the district: for each expectation, what the record shows and whether it meets it, falls short, or leaves no trace — and every such reading is checked by a second, sceptical pass before it is trusted. Ask whether the district is financially healthy, whether its bond money is overseen the way the rules expect, or how stable its leadership has been, and the answer sets the record's facts against that norm, saying plainly which is which, and cites both.
The model is the yardstick, never a fact about Newark. A judgement against it is always attributed, with the law or guidance it rests on, and never stated as fact.
Plexus keeps a history of its own understandings, so it can tell you what changed between one reading of the record and the next, and why.